Work related travel and waiting in the Jury lounge have
fringe benefits that aid readers like me to quickly get through their reading
pile. So here I go, two more countries done – Zimbabwe and Nepal. Picked “We
need new names” by NoViolet Bulawayo for Zimbabwe and “Arresting God in
Kathmandu” by Samrat Upadhyay for Nepal.
In “We need new names” NoViolet describes the slow decline
of her country under Mugabe leading to emigration of many to
neighboring countries and to the West. It traces the life of Darling, a girl
born in post-colonial Zimbabwe, who roams
around the shanty town ironically called Paradise with her gang of
friends,
stealing guavas from rich neighborhoods and shoes from corpses. She is
offered
an escape to the west as her aunt lives in “Destroyedmichigan”, but she
soon
realizes despite life being much better than in Paradise, America was
not
really the Paradise she had imagined.As most immigrants Darling becomes
acutely aware of her outsider status despite her efforts to fit in, and
has mixed feelings about leaving Zimbabwe. NoViolet describes the
feeling of belonging neither here nor there beautifully, and there were a
few passages in the book that resonates with any immigrant even if you
have not fled your mother country because of war or poverty. Overall a
good book, although I had some minor issues with the writing style -
seemed to be a bit contrived and focus is more on the style. Still an
awesome debut!
"Arresting
God in Kathmandu" on the other hand failed to arrest my attention. As
the first novel written in English from Nepal, it received rave reviews,
and I can see why - the stories are all about juxtaposing the modern
with the traditional. I thought after my recent positive experiences
with short stories, I will be more inclined to read short stories, but
this one did not appeal to me much, and none of the stories stayed with
me.
Besides OBOC
have been reading a couple of other great books. "The Goldfinch" by
Donna Pratt was a fantastic read, and very hard to put down. At 700+
pages it is not a book for the faint-hearted, but well worth the effort.
I was on a 5 hour flight after a really long day, and thought I will
start the book and then get some shut eye. Instead i reached home wide
eyed and wired up and stayed up for a couple more hours reading the
book. My only gripe, the book could've used some editing - the last
section in Amsterdam was too dragged out and went on and on like a
stream of consciousness narrative (which are always hard for me to
read).
Just wrapped
up "The Plague of Doves" by Louise Erdrich who is fast becoming one of
my favorite contemporary women writers. I finally understand what one
means when they describe the writing is lyrical. Absolutely loved the
book.
A big let
down was "A visit from the goon squad" by Jennifer Egan. I really wanted
to like this book. I like puzzles, warped timelines, twists and even
enjoyed the chapter written in powerpoint. But I feel the book focused
so much on form and style over plot and substance. I don't know why it
received the Pulitzer, maybe for the innovative style? To me it is
fundamental that fiction should have a plot. Gimmicks are secondary.
That's why i loved "The Luminaries" - despite all the gimmicks, hidden
tricks, the plot was strong and was a perfect combination of Literary +
Genre fiction. "Goon squad" on the other hand was probably written for
other writers and not for readers.